To me if there's sex items, diapers or whatever and/or nude yes disturbing I guess. I also accept people look at it like that. But this article isn't about that. So I think you missed the purpose
I'm sure you knew what I mean by "child like features". that didn't mean no breasts and puffy cheeks, don't play dumb lolll. if you REALLY need me to explain what a child looks like - even though you know what a loli is - I don't mind. being very short, small voice, signs of immaturity. but again- as I said in the last post, even if they were mature that doesn't make it okay. signs of not being fully developed, etc. that's what, in most cases, is a loli.
and you're right, there is a line. when people start to sexualize these characters they think it's okay because it's accepted. it's not okay to sexualize young-looking characters despite the age. This cause it's too close to real and very serious issues. I'm sorry but that's my opinion, that's my "line". I think it's very disgusting, my bad if you take offense. and this is an article is asking what your view on the definition of lolis are isn't it? cause that's what I'm doing. you didn't have to respond ://
anyway, TLDR. I think you missed my point and it still stands.
Edit: I do consider people buying it for cute aesthetics. but you can use other terms can you not?? do you have to choose the one closest term to sexualize them?? for example, child? want a sentence? "I purchased this anime child and I think they're adorable!!" or maybe kid?
again, THIS IS ALL MY OPINION. I'm just stating what I believe a loli is. that's what this article is about, I ain't dumb homie. I read ://
ncG1vNJzZmilqZu2qMHRnpqopJyasLW1zqdlp52kZK%2Btu8appqysX259eHyOnKampZWjwbR7